Research Catalog
A legal and constitutional argument against the alleged judicial right of restraining the publication of reports of judicial proceedings : as assumed in The King v. Thistlewood and others enforced against the proprietor of The Observer by a fine of £500, and afterwards confirmed by the Court of King's Bench
- Title
- A legal and constitutional argument against the alleged judicial right of restraining the publication of reports of judicial proceedings : as assumed in The King v. Thistlewood and others enforced against the proprietor of The Observer by a fine of £500, and afterwards confirmed by the Court of King's Bench / by J.P. Thomas.
- Author
- Thomas, John Penford.
- Publication
- London : Printed by I.L. Turner for S. Sweet, 1822.
Available Online
Items in the Library & Off-site
Filter by
1 Item
| Status | Format | Access | Call Number | Item Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Text | Request in advance | XMH (Thomas, J. P. Legal and constitutional argument against the alleged judicial right of restraining the publication of reports of judicial proceedings) | Offsite |
Details
- Description
- 147 p.; 24 cm.
- Subject
- Freedom of the press > Great Britain
- Bibliography (note)
- Includes bibliographical references.
- Call Number
- XMH (Thomas, J. P. Legal and constitutional argument against the alleged judicial right of restraining the publication of reports of judicial proceedings)
- OCLC
- 11149050
- Author
- Thomas, John Penford.
- Title
- A legal and constitutional argument against the alleged judicial right of restraining the publication of reports of judicial proceedings : as assumed in The King v. Thistlewood and others enforced against the proprietor of The Observer by a fine of £500, and afterwards confirmed by the Court of King's Bench / by J.P. Thomas.
- Imprint
- London : Printed by I.L. Turner for S. Sweet, 1822.
- Bibliography
- Includes bibliographical references.
- Connect to:
- Research Call Number
- XMH (Thomas, J. P. Legal and constitutional argument against the alleged judicial right of restraining the publication of reports of judicial proceedings)