Research Catalog

George T. Simpson, et al., appellants, vs. David C. Shepard, no. 599. George T. Simpson, et al., appellants, vs. Emma B. Kennedy, executrix, et al., George T. Simpson, et al., appellants, vs. Henry A. James, consolidated no. 600. George T. Simpson, et al., appellants, vs. William Shillaber, no. 601. Appellees' brief. Hale Holden, Pierce Butler, Jared How, William D. Mitchell, solicitors for appellees.

Title: George T. Simpson, et al., appellants, vs. David C. Shepard, no. 599. George T. Simpson, et al., appellants, vs. Emma B. Kennedy, executrix, et al., George T. Simpson, et al., appellants, vs. Henry A. James, consolidated no. 600. George T. Simpson, et al., appellants, vs. William Shillaber, no. 601. Appellees' brief. Hale Holden, Pierce Butler, Jared How, William D. Mitchell, solicitors for appellees.
Author: United States. Courts. Supreme Court.
Publication: [n.p., 1911]

Items in the Library & Off-site

Filter by

2 Items

Item details
Status	Format	Access	Call Number	Item Location
Request for On-site Use Request Scan How do I pick up this item and when will it be ready?	Text	Request in advance	TPG (United States. Courts: Supreme Court. George T. Simpson, et al., appellants, vs. David C. Shepard, no. 599)	Offsite
Request for On-site Use Request Scan How do I pick up this item and when will it be ready?	Text	Request in advance	TPG (United States. Courts: Supreme Court. George T. Simpson, et al., appellants, vs. David C. Shepard, no. 599)	Offsite

Details

Description

927 p. tables.; 8vo.

Subjects

Note

Cover-title.
At head of title: Supreme Court of the United States. October term, 1911.
"This brief is in support of that part of the decree appealed from which adjudges that the laws and orders complained of are void because they prescribe confiscatory rates in violation of the fourteenth amendment of the Constitution of the United States. A separate brief has been filed by appellees in support of that part of the decree which adjudges that the laws and orders complained of are void because in violation of the commerce clause of the Constitution."--p. [1].
The cases concern suits brought against George T. Simpson, as attorney general, and against the Railroad and Warehouse Commission of Minnesota and the Northern Pacific, Great Northern and Minneapolis and St. Louis Railroad Companies by stockholders of the respective companies, who alleged that acts of the Legislature and orders of the commission, prescribing reduced freight and passenger rates, were unconstitutional.

Call Number

TPG (United States. Courts: Supreme Court. George T. Simpson, et al., appellants, vs. David C. Shepard, no. 599)

OCLC

39010220

Author

United States. Courts. Supreme Court.

Title

George T. Simpson, et al., appellants, vs. David C. Shepard, no. 599. George T. Simpson, et al., appellants, vs. Emma B. Kennedy, executrix, et al., George T. Simpson, et al., appellants, vs. Henry A. James, consolidated no. 600. George T. Simpson, et al., appellants, vs. William Shillaber, no. 601. Appellees' brief. Hale Holden, Pierce Butler, Jared How, William D. Mitchell, solicitors for appellees.

Imprint

[n.p., 1911]

Research Call Number

TPG (United States. Courts: Supreme Court. George T. Simpson, et al., appellants, vs. David C. Shepard, no. 599)

View in Legacy Catalog