Presents articles that argue for and against different types of terrorism prevention, discussing the effects of recent reforms, preemptive war, and whether or not military justice violates human rights.
Includes bibliographical references (p. 138-144) and index.
Processing Action (note)
committed to retain
Contents
The United States must act decisively to defend itself -- Unilateralism and preemptive war do more harm than good -- Military justice is an appropriate way to deal with terrorists -- The war on terror violates human rights -- New laws are needed to fight terrorism -- Anti-terrorism laws are ineffective and dangerous.