Research Catalog

Title

Capturing value increase in urban redevelopment : a study of how the economic value increase in urban redevelopment can be used to finance the necessary public infrastructure and other facilities / Demetrio Muñoz Gielen.

Author

Muñoz Gielen, Demetrio, 1970-

Publication

Leiden : Sidestone Press, ©2010.

Items in the Library & Off-site

Details

Description

xvi, 478 pages : illustrations, maps; 26 cm

Alternative Title

Het verhalen van waardestijging in stedelijke herstructurering

Subject

• Urban renewal > Europe
• Infrastructure (Economics) > Europe > Finance
• Urban economics > Europe
• Infrastructure (Economics) > Finance
• Urban economics
• Urban renewal
• Infrastruktur
• Stadtsanierung
• Stadtökonomie
• Stadtsanierung
• Infrastruktur
• Finanzierung
• Europe
• Europa
• Europa

Bibliography (note)

• Includes bibliographical references (p. 375-398).

Contents

• Machine generated contents note: ch. 1. Introduction: problems in the financing of public goals in urban regeneration in the Netherlands -- 1.1. Recent history in Dutch land & housing policies: towards more private involvement -- 1.2. Problems with financing public goals in urban regeneration -- 1.3. Could legally binding land use rules help to improve the financing of public goals? -- 1.4. Legitimacy of capturing value increase -- 1.5. Formulation of the problem -- 1.6. Research Questions -- 1.7. The structure of this report -- 1.8. The practical value of this research -- ch. 2. Theoretical framework: capturing value increase within policy networks -- 2.1. Power and the role of public bodies in policy networks -- 2.1.1. The Policy network approach to power relationships -- 2.1.2. How to intervene in policy networks: Network management -- 2.2. The formal rules governing property rights in land -- 2.2.1. Restrictions on the exercise of property rights in land -- 2.2.2. The nationalization of development rights in England and Wales -- 2.2.3. The Netherlands: the debate about splitting development rights from land ownership -- 2.2.4. The separation of infrastructure provision from property rights in the Spanish region of Valencia -- 2.3 .Binding rules which influence certainty and flexibility in planning -- 2.3.1. Plan-led versus development-led planning systems -- 2.3.2. The arguments for and against certainty and flexibility in planning -- 2.3.3. Some financial aspects of certainty in planning -- 2.4. Model of the causal relationship between formal rules relevant to zoning and capturing value increase in urban regeneration -- 2.4.1. The activities and the actors in urban regeneration -- 2.4.2. Causalities of the amount of value increase finally captured -- 2.4.3. Financial analysis of the cases -- 2.5. The hypotheses -- 2.5.1. The first network constitution measure: modifying the contents of property rights -- 2.5.2. The second network constitution measure: modifying the level of certainty about future development terms -- ch. 3. Method -- 3.1. Why case research? -- 3.1.1. Multiple case design -- 3.1.2.Interviews -- 3.1.3.Moment of data gathering -- 3.2.The validity of the findings -- 3.2.1.Internal validity -- 3.2.2.External validity -- 3.3.Answering the Research Questions -- 3.3.1. Answering Preparatory Research Question 1 -- 3.3.2. Answering Preparatory Research Question 2 -- 3.3.3. Answering Preparatory Research Question 3 -- 3.3.4. Answering the Main Research Question -- ch. 4. Quick scan : formal rules relevant to zoning in Western European countries -- 4.1. Zoning regulations in the negotiation processes -- 4.1.1.Are zoning regulations (binding and not-binding) approved in early stages of development processes? -- 4.1.2. Approval of detailed binding rules at the development moment -- 4.1.3. Conclusions regarding the place of binding rules in the negotiation process : Plan-led versus Development-led -- 4.2. Contents of binding rules -- 4.2.1. Zoning plans vs. implementation-oriented plans, both binding -- 4.2.2. Limited vs. broad contents binding rules -- 4.2.3. Conditioning the approval of binding rules to securing implementation -- 4.3. Procedure for the approval of binding rules -- 4.4. Binding rules in relation to property rights -- 4.4.1 .Is infrastructure provision separated from development rights? -- 4.4.2. Control of transactions in infrastructure provision -- 4.5. Selection of countries -- ch. 5. The Spanish region of Valencia -- 5.1. Urban regeneration in the region of Valencia -- 5.1.1. Revitalization of historic centers and deteriorated neighborhoods -- 5.1.2. Rezoning old industrial and office sites into residential -- 5.2. Capturing value increase through the land readjustment regulation -- 5.2.1. Landowners lead land readjustment: 1956 -- 1994 -- 5.2.2. The urbanizing agent leads the land readjustment: 1994-onwards -- 5.3. The legal limits for capturing value increase in the region of Valencia -- 5.3.1 .Public share of value increase -- 5.3.2. Value increase as compensation for taking responsibility for public infrastructure and facilities -- 5.3.3. Social/affordable housing -- 5.4. Introduction to the studied cases in the region of Valencia -- 5.4.1 .Guillem de Anglesola, City of Valencia -- 5.4.2. Periodista Gil Sumbiela, City of Valencia -- 5.4.3. Camino Hondo del Grao, City of Valencia -- 5.4.4. Benalua Sur, City of Alicante -- 5.5. How formal rules relevant to zoning in Valencia can be used -- 5.5.1. Creating certainty beforehand about future building possibilities and contributions -- 5.5.2. Possible contents of the binding rules -- 5.5.3. Conditioning binding rules on securing capturing value increase -- 5.5.4. Modulating Property rights -- 5.5.5. Procedure for the preparation and approval of the binding rules -- 5.6. The actual degree of captured value increase in Valencia -- 5.7. Causal relationships between formal rules relevant to zoning and capturing value increase in Valencia -- 5.7.1. The inferred causalities -- 5.7.2. Possible third variables -- ch. 6. England -- 6.1 .Urban Regeneration in England -- 6.2. The legal limits to capturing value increase in England -- 6.2.1 .Taxing betterment -- 6.2.2. Capturing value increase through section 106-agreements -- 6.2.3. Social/affordable housing -- 6.3. Introduction to the studied cases in England -- 6.3.1. Harbourside (Canon's Marsh), City of Bristol -- 6.3.2. Temple Quay North, City of Bristol -- 6.3.3. Megabowl, City of Bristol -- 6.4. How formal rules relevant to zoning in England can be used -- 6.4.1. Creating certainty beforehand about future building possibilities and contributions -- 6.4.2. Choosing the contents of the binding rules (the planning permission) -- 6.4.3. Conditioning binding rules (the planning permission) on securing capturing value increase -- 6.4.4. Modulating property rights -- 6.4.5. Procedure for the preparation and approval of the binding rules (the planning permission) -- 6.5. The actual degree of captured value increase in England -- 6.6. Causal relationships between formal rules relevant to zoning and capturing value increase in England -- 6.6.1. The inferred causalities -- 6.6.2. Possible third variables -- ch. 7. The Netherlands -- 7.1. Urban Regeneration in the Netherlands -- 7.2. Capturing value increase and its legal limits in the Netherlands -- 7.2.1. Betterment belongs to the landowner -- 7.2.2. Capturing value increase through private law agreements -- 7.2.3. The 2008's novelties -- 7.3 Introduction to the studied cases in the Netherlands -- 7.3.1. De Funen, Amsterdam -- 7.3.2. Kruidenbuurt Noord, Eindhoven -- 7.3.3. Kop van Oost, Groningen -- 7.3.4. Stationskwartier, Breda -- 7.4. How formal rules relevant to zoning in the Netherlands can be used -- 7.4.1. Certainty beforehand about future building possibilities and contributions -- 7.4.2. Choosing the contents of the relevant binding rules -- 7.4.3. Making binding rules conditional on securing capturing value increase -- 7.4.4. Modulating property rights -- 7.4.5. Procedure for the preparation and approval of binding rules -- 7.5. The actual degree of captured value increase in the Netherlands -- 7.6. Causal relationships between formal rules relevant to zoning and capturing value increase in the Netherlands -- 7.6.1. The inferred causalities -- 7.6.2 .Possible third variables -- ch. 8. Conclusions -- 8.1. Certainty beforehand about future building possibilities and contributions -- 8.2. Choosing the contents of legally binding rules -- 8.3. Making binding rules conditional on the developer securing his contributions -- 8.4. Modulating property rights -- ch. 9. Recommendations for the Netherlands -- 9.1. Creating certainty beforehand about future building possibilities and contributions -- 9.1.1. Short-term recommendations: create Certainty in indicative documents -- 9.1.2. Long-term recommendations: legal modifications -- 9.2.Choosing the contents of binding rules -- 9.3.Making binding rules conditional on the developer securing his contributions -- 9.3.1.Short-term recommendation: alternative ways of conditioning -- 9.3.2.Long-term recommendation: direct conditioning through legal modification -- 9.4. Modulating property rights -- 9.4.1. Short-term recommendation: assessment of financial feasibility -- 9.4.2. Short-term recommendation: land readjustment through private law agreements, supported by expropriation and pre-emption -- 9.4.3.
• Long-term recommendation: land readjustment regulation -- 9.5. Epilogue -- Annexes -- Annex 1. Check lists -- Annex 2. Planning legislation -- Annex 3. Development costs and returns in the English cases -- Annex 4. Development costs and returns in the Dutch cases -- Annex 5. Survey of Monofunctional residential districts -- Annex 6. Comparison development costs and returns in the Valencian, English and Dutch cases -- Annex 7. Experiment in Zevenhuizen, South-Holland.

ISBN

• 9789088900594
• 9088900590

OCLC

• ocn713803459
• 713803459
• SCSB-1606921

Owning Institutions

Princeton University Library