Research Catalog
Has the EU support to the food-processing industry been effective and efficient in adding value to agricultural products? : (pursuant to article 287(4), second subparagraph, TFEU
- Title
- Has the EU support to the food-processing industry been effective and efficient in adding value to agricultural products? : (pursuant to article 287(4), second subparagraph, TFEU / European Court of Auditors.
- Publication
- Luxembourg : Publications Office of the European Union, 2013.
Items in the Library & Off-site
Filter by
1 Item
Status | Format | Access | Call Number | Item Location |
---|---|---|---|---|
Text | Use in library | HD9015.A2 H37 2013q Oversize | Off-site |
Details
- Additional Authors
- European Court of Auditors.
- Description
- 57 p. : col. ill.; 30 cm.
- Summary
- As part of the EU's rural development policy grants are made available to enterprises that process and market agricultural products, which should also result in improving the competitiveness of the agricultural sector. The Court's audit examined whether the EU support had been effective and efficient in this respect, but found that member states do not direct the funding to projects for which there is a demonstrable need for public support. Without this, the measure risks becoming a handout--a general support to enterprises investing in the food-processing sector--with the attendant risks of distortion of competition and inefficient use of scarce public money. The Court provided recommendations that should allow the Commission and the member states to remedy the weaknesses mentioned.
- Series Statement
- Special report, 1831-0834 ; no. 1/2013
- Uniform Title
- Special report (European Court of Auditors) ; no. 2013/1.
- Subject
- Note
- "doi: 10.2865/65797"--T.p. verso.
- "QJ-AB-13-001-EN-C"--Cover p. [4].
- Bibliography (note)
- Includes bibliographical references.
- Additional Formats (note)
- Also available on the Internet.
- Contents
- Executive summary -- Introduction -- Audit scope and approach -- Observations. Part one: has the measure been designed in a way that provides for the efficient funding of projects addressing clearly identified needs?; Part two: have member states implemented the measure with due regard to value for money?; Part three: have the Commission and the member states appropriately monitored and evaluated the results of the measure? -- Conclusions and recommendations -- Annex I: EU funds for measure 123 programmed and spent (as at December 2011) -- Annex II: list of projects audited and the Court's assessment of the efficiency and effectiveness of the grant -- Annex III: mid-term evaluation reports reviewed -- Reply of the Commission.
- ISBN
- 9789292411374 (pbk.)
- 9292411373 (pbk.)
- OCLC
- ocn842909382
- SCSB-1696786
- Owning Institutions
- Princeton University Library