Research Catalog

  • In the United States District Court, Northern District of California : the United States vs. Andrés Castillero, no. 420 : "New Almaden" : transcript of the record / P. Della Torre, Edmund Randolph, of counsel ; A.C. Peachy, Fred'k Billings for claimant.

    • Text
    • San Francisco : [s.n.], 1859-1861.
    • 1859-1861
    • 4 Items

    Available Online

    See All Available Online Resources

    FormatCall NumberItem Location
    Text 3-VHH (United States. Courts. District Court. California, Northern District. United States vs. Andrés Castillero, New Almaden Mine. 1859) v. 2Offsite
    FormatCall NumberItem Location
    Text 3-VHH (United States. Courts. District Court. California, Northern District. United States vs. Andrés Castillero, New Almaden Mine. 1859) v. 3Offsite
    FormatCall NumberItem Location
    Text 3-VHH (United States. Courts. District Court. California, Northern District. United States vs. Andrés Castillero, New Almaden Mine. 1859) v. 4Offsite
  • Great Falls Manufacturing Company, vs. the United States.

    • Text
    • [Washington, D.C. : Publisher not identified, 1863]
    • 1863
    • 1 Item
    FormatCall NumberItem Location
    Text VDLA p.v. 34 no. 1-11Schwarzman Building - General Research Room 315

    Available - Can be used on site. Please visit New York Public Library - Schwarzman Building to submit a request in person.

  • Samuel C. Williamson vs. the United States : no. 6,498. Claimant's brief.

    • Text
    • [Washington, D.C.?] : [publisher not identified], [187-]
    • 187
    • 1 Item
    FormatCall NumberItem Location
    Text IDF n.c. 1 no. 1-25Schwarzman Building - Milstein Division Room 121

    Available - Can be used on site. Please visit New York Public Library - Schwarzman Building to submit a request in person.

  • Petition of Charles W. Adams.

    • Text
    • [Washington, D.C.?] : [publisher not identified], [1874?]
    • 1874
    • 1 Item
    FormatCall NumberItem Location
    Text IDF n.c. 1 no. 1-25Schwarzman Building - Milstein Division Room 121

    Available - Can be used on site. Please visit New York Public Library - Schwarzman Building to submit a request in person.

  • Claim of Benjamin L. Brittin.

    • Text
    • [Washington, D.C.?] : [publisher not identified], [1874]
    • 1874
    • 1 Item
    FormatCall NumberItem Location
    Text IDF n.c. 1 no. 1-25Schwarzman Building - Milstein Division Room 121

    Available - Can be used on site. Please visit New York Public Library - Schwarzman Building to submit a request in person.

  • Case of Albert Grant. Brief of H.E. Paine, attorney for A. Grant.

    • Text
    • [Washington, D.C.?] : [publisher not identified], [1872?]
    • 1872
    • 1 Item
    FormatCall NumberItem Location
    Text IDF n.c. 1 no. 1-25Schwarzman Building - Milstein Division Room 121

    Available - Can be used on site. Please visit New York Public Library - Schwarzman Building to submit a request in person.

  • Invalidity of N.R.A. codes. Opinion of the Supreme court of the United States, together with the concurring opinions of Justices Cardozo and Stone, in the case of A.L.A. Schechter poultry corporation and others v. the United States of America; and the United States of America, petitioner, v. A.L.A. Schechter poultry corporation and others, involving the question of the constitutionality of the "Live poultry code", promulgated under the National industrial recovery act.

    • Text
    • Washington, U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1935.
    • 1935
    • 1 Item
    FormatCall NumberItem Location
    Text HD3616.U455 A45Off-site
  • The Williams & Wilkins Company v. The United States : decided November 27, 1973 in the United States Court of Claims, No. 73-68 : opinion / by Judge Davis; dissenting by Chief Judge Cowen.

    • Text
    • Bethesda, Maryland : Reprinted by DfS Press, [1974?]
    • 1974
    • 1 Item
    FormatCall NumberItem Location
    Text KF3030.1.A52 U54 x, 1974Off-site
  • Lloyd D. Tounwin and Andrew Dunlap on relation of the Caddo tribe of Indians and the Caddo tribe of Oklahoma, each in behalf of others similarly situated and on behalf of the Caddo tribe and various bands and groups of each of them comprising the Caddo tribe and nation of Indians, plaintiffs, v. the United States of America, defendants. Brief of the plaintiffs in support of their claim of title to the ceded area in Treaty of July 1, 1935. O.R. McGuire, attorney of record ...

    • Text
    • Washington, Wison-Epes print. co. [1955?]
    • 1955
    • 1 Item
    FormatCall NumberItem Location
    Text US 964.9 MACOff-site
  • Eugene V. Debs, plaintiff in error, vs. the United States of America. In error to the District court of the United States for the northern district of Ohio ...

    • Text
    • Washington, D.C., Judd & Detweiler, 1918.
    • 1918
    • 1 Item
    FormatCall NumberItem Location
    Text US 996 DEBOff-site
  • The Williams & Wilkins Company, plaintiff, against the United States, defendant ...

    • Text
    • [n.p., 1970?]
    • 1970
    • 1 Item
    FormatCall NumberItem Location
    Text US 996 WILOff-site
  • Sketch of an argument delivered before the District Court of the U. States, at the second session, held at St. Louis on the fourth Monday in November 1824. Together with various remarks on certain Spanish laws and ordinances, obtained since that time, which have been submitted in writing to the judge of the same court.

    • Text
    • St. Louis, Printed by E. Charless, 1825.
    • 1825
    • 1 Item
    FormatCall NumberItem Location
    Text US 25070.40.5Off-site
  • The Navajo Tribe of Indians (Docket no. 229), The Fort Sill Apache Tribe of Oklahoma, the Chiricahua Apache Tribe, et al. (Docket no. 30), the Chiricahua and Warm Springs Tribes of Apache Indians, et al. (Docket no. 48), petitioners, v. The United States of America, defendant. Proposed findings of fact in behalf of the Navajo Tribe of Indians in area of Chiricahua overlap (Dockets 30 and 48). Norman M. Littell [and] Leland O. Graham, attorneys of record for petitioners, The Navajo Tribe of Indians.

    • Text
    • [Washington, D.C.] 1964.
    • 1964
    • 1 Item
    FormatCall NumberItem Location
    Text L.SOC.120.146.9.80.3Off-site
  • The Navajo Tribe of Indians (Docket no. 229), the Havasupai tribe of the Havasupai Reservation, Arizona (Docket no. 91), petitioners, v. The United States of America, defendant. Proposed findings of fact in behalf of the Navajo Tribe of Indians in area of Havasupai overlap (Docket no. 91). Norman M. Littell [and] Leland O. Graham, attorneys of record for the petitioner, The Navajo Tribe of Indians.

    • Text
    • [Washington, D.C.] 1963.
    • 1963
    • 1 Item
    FormatCall NumberItem Location
    Text L.SOC.120.146.9.80.1Off-site
  • The Navajo Tribe of Indians (Docket no. 229), The Hopi Tribe, et al. (Docket no. 196), petitioners, v. The United States of America, defendant. Proposed findings of fact in behalf of the Navajo Tribe of Indians in the area of Hopi overlap (Docket no. 196). vol. I-III. Norman M. Littell [and] Leland O. Graham, attorneys of record for petitioner, The Navajo Tribe of Indians.

    • Text
    • [Washington, D.C.] 1964.
    • 1964
    • 2 Items
    FormatCall NumberItem Location
    Text L.SOC.120.146.9.80.4 v.1-2 (1964)Off-site
    FormatCall NumberItem Location
    Text L.SOC.120.146.9.80.4 v.3 (1964)Off-site
  • The Navajo Tribe of Indians (Docket no. 229), The Pueblo of Laguna, et al. (Docket no. 227), Pueblo de Acoma (Docket no. 266), petitioners, v. The United States of America, defendant. Proposed findings of fact in behalf of the Navajo Tribe of Indians in Acoma-Laguna overlap (Dockets 266 and 227). Norman M. Littell [and] Leland O. Graham, attorneys of record for petitioner, The Navajo Tribe of Indians.

    • Text
    • [Washington, D.C., United Printing Services, 1963]
    • 1963
    • 1 Item
    FormatCall NumberItem Location
    Text L.SOC.120.146.9.80.2Off-site
  • Transcript of record. Proceedings in United States Circuit court of appeals, seventh circuit ... October term, A.D., 1907. No. 1409. Standard oil company, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Indiana, plaintiff in error, vs. United States of America, defendant in error. In error to the District court of the United States for the Northern district of Illinois, Eastern division.

    • Text
    • [Washington, Govt.print.off., 1908]
    • 1908
    • 1 Item
    FormatCall NumberItem Location
    Text Econ 3910.9Off-site
  • W.S. Porter, plaintiff in error, vs. United States, defendant in error. Writ of error from the District court of the United States of America for the Western district of Texas at Austin. Brief and argument for plaintiff in error. Ward & James, attorneys for plaintiff in error.

    • Text
    • [Austin, Tex.], [1940]
    • 1940
    • 1 Item
    FormatCall NumberItem Location
    Text KF224.P67 H467 1940Off-site
  • John H. Patterson et al., plaintiffs in error, vs. United States, defendant in error. Error to the district court of the United States for the southern district of Ohio. Western Division. Record ...

    • Text
    • [Columbus, O., Toothaker, 1914?]
    • 1914-present
    • 3 Items
    FormatCall NumberItem Location
    Text 7685.06 vol.1Off-site
    FormatCall NumberItem Location
    Text 7685.06 vol.2Off-site
    FormatCall NumberItem Location
    Text 7685.06 vol.3Off-site

No results found from Digital Research Books Beta

Digital books for research from multiple sources world wide- all free to read, download, and keep. No Library Card is Required. Read more about the project.

digital-research-book
Explore Digital Research Books Beta